Dynamic DAPT Risk Prediction with Transformer-DAPT – EMJ

This site is intended for healthcare professionals

AI Model Enhances DAPT Risk Assessment After PCI

Dynamic DAPT Risk Prediction with Transformer-DAPT – EMJ

Key Summary:

  • Transformer-DAPT predicted ischaemic and bleeding risk across multiple post-PCI time intervals.
  • Transformer-DAPT outperformed benchmark survival models in internal and external validation cohorts.
  • Dynamic risk estimates may support personalised DAPT management during the first year after PCI.

TRANSFORMER dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) significantly improved dynamic prediction of ischaemic and bleeding events in patients receiving DAPT following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), according to a new study from Florida, USA.

Researchers developed Transformer-DAPT, a transformer based deep-learning survival framework designed to provide patient-specific risk estimates across clinically relevant time intervals during the first year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

The model was trained using electronic health records from 29,032 patients and externally validated in a separate cohort of 19,173 patients.

Current approaches to guiding DAPT duration rely largely on rule-based risk scores that offer static assessments at single time points and have reported discrimination values ranging from 0.63 to 0.73.

According to the investigators, such approaches may be limited in their ability to support personalised treatment decisions throughout follow-up.

Transformer-DAPT Outperformed Existing Models

In the development cohort, Transformer-DAPT achieved time dependent-concordance index values ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 for ischaemic event prediction, and 0.81 to 0.88 for bleeding event prediction.

The model outperformed other deep-learning models, including DeepSurv and DeepHit, by 2 to 12% across evaluated intervals.

Performance remained consistent during external validation. Time-dependent concordance index values ranged from 0.74 to 0.84 for ischaemic events and 0.75 to 0.83 for bleeding events.

Although performance was modestly lower than in the development cohort, the model continued to outperform benchmark models while maintaining clinically meaningful discrimination.

Potential Role in Personalised DAPT Management

Beyond discrimination performance, Transformer-DAPT demonstrated improved calibration.

For 12-month ischaemic predictions, expected calibration error improved from 0.050 to 0.016 following calibration. For bleeding predictions, expected calibration error improved from 0.188 to 0.011.

The investigators also highlighted the model’s ability to generate individualised risk trajectories.

In representative patient examples, predicted shifts from ischaemic-dominant to bleeding-dominant risk occurred before or during follow-up.

Researchers suggest that this could potentially identify time points when DAPT strategies could be reassessed within the broader clinical context.

Overall, the findings suggest that Transformer-DAPT may provide a practical framework for multi-interval risk prediction and support more personalised management of DAPT during the critical first year after PCI.

Reference

Abdelhameed A et al. Transformer-DAPT: AI-based dynamic assessment of ischemic and bleeding risks in patients on DAPT following PCI. npj Digit. Med. 2026;DOI:10.1038/s41746-026-02977-9.

Featured image: Peakstock on Adobe Stock

Author:

Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.

Rate this content's potential impact on patient outcomes

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this content.