ENDING publicly funded HIV testing programmes could lead to a significant rise in new HIV infections, according to new modelling research.
HIV is a virus that attacks the immune system and, if untreated, can progress to AIDS. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment not only improve patient outcomes but also play a crucial role in preventing transmission.
The study examined what might happen if funding for HIV testing from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) were halted across multiple US states. These programmes currently support testing through local health departments and community organisations, helping identify infections early and link individuals to care.
Projected Surge in HIV Infections Without Testing
Using a validated HIV transmission model, researchers simulated epidemics across 18 US states under different funding scenarios. If CDC-funded HIV testing were to stop in October 2025 and not resume, the model projects an additional 12,719 HIV infections by 2030, a 10% increase compared with uninterrupted testing.
Even if funding were restored later, the effects remained substantial. Delays in reinstating testing services led to sustained increases in new infections, underscoring how even temporary interruptions can have long-term consequences.
The impact was not uniform across states. Areas with more extensive reliance on CDC-funded testing, as well as those with more rural HIV epidemics, were predicted to experience the largest increases. In some regions, projected rises were modest, while others could see infections climb sharply.
Why Early HIV Testing Matters
HIV testing is a cornerstone of prevention because individuals who are diagnosed early can begin antiretroviral therapy, reducing viral load to undetectable levels and effectively eliminating the risk of transmission. Disruptions to testing services may delay diagnosis, allowing the virus to spread unknowingly within communities.
The findings highlight the importance of maintaining consistent access to testing, particularly in underserved and rural areas where healthcare resources may already be limited.
Implications for Public Health Policy
While the study is based on modelling rather than real-world outcomes, it provides strong evidence that sustained investment in HIV testing programmes is critical to controlling the epidemic. Policymakers may need to weigh the potential downstream consequences of funding cuts, including increased healthcare costs and preventable infections.
Overall, the research reinforces a clear message: maintaining robust HIV testing infrastructure remains essential to reducing transmission and improving long-term public health outcomes.
Reference
Balasubramanian R et al. The potential effect of ending CDC funding for HIV tests: a modeling study in 18 states. Clin Infect Dis. 2026; DOI:10.1093/cid/ciag038.
Featured image: jes2uphoto on Adobe Stock
