Exploring the Clinical and Economic Impact of Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis - European Medical Journal

Exploring the Clinical and Economic Impact of Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis

3 Mins
Respiratory
Download PDF
Presenters:
Ruxana T. Sadikot , 1 Sunjay R. Devarajan 2
Speakers:
Ruxana T. Sadikot , 1 Sunjay R. Devarajan 2
Disclosure:

Sadikot has received grant funding from Veteran Affairs Merit Review and The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NIH NHLBI), and honoraria from the American Physician Institute. Devarajan has been a paid consultant for Insmed Incorporated. Fastenau is an employee of Insmed Incorporated.

Acknowledgements:

Maitreyee Mohanty, Phani Veeranki, Nnaemeka U. Odo, Melanie Lauterio, Sebastian Fucile, Joseph Feliciano, Guilherme Lopes, Manu Tyagi, Zhun Cao, and John Fastenau were co-authors. Medical writing assistance was provided by Hannah Moir, EMJ, London, UK.

Disclaimer:

Insmed Incorporated participated in the study design, research, analysis, data collection, and interpretation of data, as well as review and approval of this article.

Support:

The studies included herein, and the publication of this article, were developed and funded by Insmed Incorporated.
The content of this article reviews two presentations from the American Thoracic Society (ATS) 2025 International Conference that took place in San Francisco, California, USA, between 18th–21st May 2025.

Citation:
Keywords:
Bronchiectasis, economic burden, non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE), treatment patterns.

Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.

Meeting Summary

Non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE) is often under-recognized and misdiagnosed, and is associated with significant clinical and economic burden. This article highlights two presentations from the American Thoracic Society (ATS) 2025 International Conference, which took place in San Francisco, California, USA, between 17th–21st May 2025, highlighting real-world evidence (RWE) data on treatment patterns, complications and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) associated with NCFBE.

Ruxana T. Sadikot, Professor and Chief of the Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine Division at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC), Omaha, USA, and Sunjay R. Devarajan, Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA, presented real-world evidence of treatment patterns and costs associated with HCRU in NCFBE.

Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis

Bronchiectasis is a chronic and progressive inflammatory lung disease, characterized by permanent and abnormal dilatation of the bronchi and accompanied by cough, sputum production, and recurrent bronchial infection and exacerbations.1,2 Bronchiectasis that is not associated with cystic fibrosis is known as NCFBE.3

The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis has been described as a vicious vortex, driven by inflammation, chronic airway infection, impaired mucociliary clearance, and progressive lung damage.3,4 Neutrophils are the primary inflammatory cells in patients with bronchiectasis and are believed to be key drivers in disease severity and progression.3-8 Bronchiectasis is associated with high disease burden on patients and healthcare systems, presenting with recurrent exacerbations and progressive lung function decline, increased hospitalizations, and worsening health-related quality of life.9-13 International guidelines for bronchiectasis recommend a multi-modal approach focusing on controlling symptoms and infection, reducing exacerbations, enhancing mucociliary clearance, and treatment of etiologies and comorbidities.9,14,15 There are no US guidelines.The primary management goals of bronchiectasis focus on symptom control and reducing exacerbation frequency to improve health-related quality of life.14,15 However, challenges arise due to the clinical heterogeneity and limited treatment options.16 This highlights the need for data on treatment patterns and clinical outcomes to enhance understanding of bronchiectasis management practices. Here, this article focuses on new data presented at the ATS that highlights insights on treatment patterns, complications, and hospitalizations in NCFBE.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients with Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis

Lead Author/Presenter: Ruxana T. Sadikot

The clinical and economic burden of NCFBE on patients and healthcare systems is significant,16 but not thoroughly understood, especially regarding HCRU.

Findings were presented from a retrospective cohort study using de-identified claims from Optum’s Market Clarity database.16 The study included patients diagnosed with NCFBE in the USA between January 1st, 2017–March 31st, 2020.16 Eligible patients were those ≥12 years old with either ≥2 outpatient claims for bronchiectasis ≥30 days apart or ≥1 inpatient claim, excluding those with cystic fibrosis. Continuous enrollment was required for ≥12 months before (baseline) and ≥24 months after (follow-up) the first bronchiectasis claim.16 The analysis identified 12,018 people with NCFBE (mean age 68.5±13.2 years; 67% female).16

Commonly Prescribed Medications for Patients with Bronchiectasis

During the 2-year follow-up period, the commonly prescribed medications included corticosteroids, short-acting β-agonists antibiotics, and long-acting β-agonists. During the follow-up period, treatment patterns (for any duration), identified that around half of patients received one or more medications (Figure 1).16

Figure 1: Most common treatments of any duration for bronchiectasis (N=12,018; any time during follow-up using medical and pharmacy claims).16
*General nebulizer-device use, excluding inhalers and distinct from antibiotic or bronchodilator use.
ICS: inhaled corticosteroids; LABA: long-acting β-agonist; SABA: short-acting β-agonist.

Notably, 37.5% were prescribed long-acting bronchodilators for ≥6 months. Injectable corticosteroids were used by 32.6% of the patients, with 28.4% prescribed inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonist combination inhalers. Bronchodilators were used for a mean duration of 4.5 months.16 Macrolides were the most common first-line antibiotics prescribed (25.7%), with a mean of 7 months.16 Of these patients, 94% discontinued their treatment.17 During follow-up, nearly half of the patients switched back to a macrolide (49.7%); the remaining were prescribed alternative antibiotics such as penicillin (49.5%), quinolones (62.1%), and cephalosporins (63.0%).16  Long-term use of macrolides (≥6 months) was used in 9.4% of patients, with a mean duration of treatment of 1.2 months, compared to approximately 12 days for other antibiotics.16

Complications and Mortality Associated with Bronchiectasis

Sadikot reported that complications associated with NCFBE included respiratory failure, heart failure, having a lung transplant, and experiencing ≥1 bronchiectasis exacerbation. Approximately one-fifth of patients (22%) experienced respiratory failure over the 2-year follow-up period (Table 1).16

Table 1: Complications and all-cause mortality during follow-up.17
*Continuous enrollment or clinical activity were not required during follow-up.

Regarding HRCU, data indicated that 24.3% of patients (n=2,917) experienced respiratory-related inpatient hospital stays, and 31.4% (n=3,777) had emergency department visits (Table 1).16 The all-cause mortality rate during follow-up was 22.5% (n=5,729/25,459).16

Sadikot stated the complexity of treating NCFBE due to its heterogeneity. Frequent switching of antibiotics, reliance on multiple symptom-based therapies and steroids, along with ongoing exacerbations, suggest current approaches often fall short of effectively managing bronchiectasis.16

Hospitalizations Burden and Risk of Readmissions in Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis

Lead Author: Sunjay R. Devarajan

Presenter: John Fastenau

Another RWE study described a retrospective analysis to understand the inpatient journey and readmission risk in patients hospitalized with NCFBE.18

Using the USA PINC AI™ Healthcare database, 73,656 patients aged ≥12 years (mean [SD] age 71.8±14.7 years; 75.3% White; 58.3% female), hospitalized between January 1st, 2018–June 30th, 2022, with a primary or secondary diagnosis of bronchiectasis were identified (comorbid COPD and asthma were permitted).18 Notably, 92.3% were admitted on an urgent or emergency basis.17 Patients with a primary diagnosis of COPD or asthma, and all those with cystic fibrosis, were excluded from the analysis.18

At index hospitalization, 39.8% of patients had an existing respiratory infection, 29.5% had respiratory failure, and 85.6% had a pulmonary exacerbation.19 The most common treatments during hospitalizations were antibiotics (83.9%), bronchodilators (76.8%), and corticosteroids (68.6%).18 Additionally, 34.6% of patients required mechanical ventilation.19

The average (SD) length of index hospital stay was 7.1±9.4 days, costing on average 22,355±45,160 USD. Approximately 17% required intensive care, averaging 16,375±35,847 USD in costs. Following the index hospitalization, 5.9% of patients died.18

Also, Fastenau reported that post-discharge, most patients had significant post-acute care needs, with over half (53.8%) requiring special discharge plans; 23.3% were discharged to specialized healthcare facilities for long-term, around-the-clock care, and 21.9% received home healthcare.18  Patients were also likely to be readmitted to hospital, resulting in higher healthcare costs; 22.6% were readmitted within 90 days of discharge, for on average 7.9±9.6 days, and costing 24,576±41,189 USD.18

Multivariable logistic regression (Figure 2) indicated that all-cause readmission risk was associated with prior hospitalizations, a history of COPD or asthma, and longer hospital stays (all p<0.001).18

Figure 2: Risk factors for 90-day hospital readmission in patients hospitalized with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis*.18
*Multivariate logistic regression modeling was performed. From the total population (N=73,656), 4,380 patients were excluded from modeling because they did not have data available in one or more predictors or died at index hospitalization. Additional variables included in the model that were nonsignificant (CI did not cross 1) were the
number of pulmonary exacerbations at baseline, ethnicity, and age.
Patients with a diagnosis code for COPD or asthma in the secondary position in a claim.

Fastenau stated that the high healthcare costs associated with NCFBE (hospitalization, readmission, and need for continuous medical care) highlight the need for improved continuity of care post-discharge to reduce readmission rates.18

Conclusion

These presentations highlight considerable variation and suboptimal management strategies for NCFBE. Frequent switching of antibiotics, reliance on multiple symptom-based therapies and steroids, along with ongoing exacerbations, suggest current approaches often fall short of effectively managing bronchiectasis. Exacerbations and complications are contributing to high hospital readmission rates and direct medical costs. This review highlights gaps in the current management of NCFBE and underscores the need for more effective approaches to reduce clinical complications and healthcare burden.

MED-ALL-BE-00039

References
Chalmers JD et al. Bronchiectasis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4(1):45. O'Donnell AE. Bronchiectasis - a clinical review. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(6):533-45. Dente FL et al. Neutrophilic bronchial inflammation correlates with clinical and functional findings in patients with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Mediators Inflamm. 2015;2015:642503. Chalmers JD et al. Neutrophilic inflammation in bronchiectasis. Eur Respir Rev. 2025;34(176):240179. Loukides S et al. Exhaled H(2)O(2) in steady-state bronchiectasis: relationship with cellular composition in induced sputum, spirometry, and extent and severity of disease. Chest. 2002;121(1):81-7. Goeminne PC et al. The Sputum Colour Chart as a predictor of lung inflammation, proteolysis and damage in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: a case-control analysis. Respirology. 2014;19(2):203-10. Watt AP et al. Neutrophil apoptosis, proinflammatory mediators and cell counts in bronchiectasis. Thorax. 2004;59(3):231-6. Tsikrika S et al. The role of non-invasive modalities for assessing inflammation in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Cytokine. 2017;99:281-6. Flume PA et al. Advances in bronchiectasis: endotyping, genetics, microbiome, and disease heterogeneity. Lancet. 2018;392:880-90. Chalmers JD et al. Neutrophil elastase activity is associated with exacerbations and lung function decline in bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195:1384-93. Tkacz J et al. Real-world treatment patterns, health care resource utilization, and costs in a US Medicare population with bronchiectasis. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024;30(9):967-77. Shoaib S et al. Real-world disease burden, mortality, and healthcare resource utilization associated with bronchiectasis. Chron Respir Dis. 2025;22:14799731241310897. Chalmers JD et al. Characterization of the “frequent exacerbator phenotype” in bronchiectasis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(11):1410-20. Polverino E et al. European Respiratory Society guidelines for the management of adult bronchiectasis. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(3):1700629. Flume PA et al. Towards development of evidence to inform recommendations for the evaluation and management of bronchiectasis. Respir Med. 2023;211:107217. Sadikot RT et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025;211:A1960. Sadikot RT et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Presentation. ATS International Conference, May 16-21, 2025. Devarajan SR et al. Hospitalizations and risk of readmissions in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2025;211:A1950. Devarajan SR et al. . Hospitalizations and risk of readmissions in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Presentation. ATS International Conference, May 16-21, 2025.

Rate this content's potential impact on patient outcomes

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this content.