Continuous Glucose Monitoring with Multiple Daily Insulin Injections Improves Perinatal Outcomes in Females with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus - European Medical Journal
×

Browse

Continuous Glucose Monitoring with Multiple Daily Insulin Injections Improves Perinatal Outcomes in Females with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

| Download as | PDF
2 Mins
Authors:
*Kateřina Anderlova,1,2 Hana Krejčí MD,1,2 Miloš Mráz,3 Martin Haluzík,3 Michal Kršek,1 Antonín Pařízek,2 Patrik Šimják2
Disclosure:

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements:

This work was supported by NU20-01-00067.

Citation
EMJ Diabetes. ;9[1]:37-39. Abstract Review No. AR1.

Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.

Receive our free quarterly newsletters and your choice of journal publication alerts, straight to your inbox.

Join our mailing list

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Females with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.1 Compared to the general population, there is a higher prevalence of congenital malformations, caesarean delivery, fetal macrosomia, large for gestational age (LGA) infants, pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery, and neonatal mortality.2-4 Insulin regimens in pregnancy include multiple daily insulin (MDI) injections and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) via insulin pumps.5-7 With advancing technologies, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is increasingly used in antenatal care at the expense of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).8-10 The aim of the authors’ study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different management options on perinatal and neonatal health outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of 232 pregnant females with T1DM from a single university-affiliated perinatal centre in the Czech Republic. Females were divided into four groups, according to the mode of glucose monitoring and treatment: SMBG with MDI injections (SMBG+MDI), SMBG with CSII (SMBG+CSII), CGM with MDI injections (CGM+MDI), CGM with CSII (CGM+CSII). Data were retrieved from the electronic
medical records.

RESULTS

Overall, 35.3% of females attended preconception counselling, with more females in CGM+CSII and less in the SMBG+MDI group (52.7% versus 18.2%; p=0.002). The authors observed lower mean HbA1c concentrations prior to conception in CGM+MDI and CGM+CSII groups (55.1±15.3 and 54.3±12.4, respectively; p=0.005). On univariate analysis, a higher rate of liveborn infants (97.0%; p=0.031) was observed in the CGM+MDI group. There was a higher incidence of operative delivery (caesarean section or instrumental vaginal delivery) in the SMBG+CSII (81.3%; p=0.048) group and fewer cases of LGA infants among females with CGM+MDI, but more in the CGM+CSII group (18.8% versus 48.1%; p=0.039). There were no cases of umbilical artery pH <7.15 in the CGM+MDI group (0; p=0.006). Perinatal results are summarised in (Table 1). Logistic regression showed that CGM+MDI decreases the odds of operative delivery (odds ratio [OR]: 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.116–0.707; p=0.007), LGA (OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.124–0.923; p=0.034), and umbilical artery pH <7.15 (OR: 0.04; 95% CI: 0.002–0.790; p=0.034). The results did not reach statistical significance after adjusting for maternal age, BMI, diabetes compensation, and morbidity.

Table 1: Perinatal results for operative delivery, caesarean section, or instrumental vaginal delivery.

CGM: continuous glucose monitoring; C-section: caesarean section; CSII: continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; d: days; HELLP: haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome; LGA: large for gestational age; MDI: multiple daily insulin; NICU: neonatal intensive care unit; SGA: small for gestational age; SMBG: self-monitoring of blood glucose; w: weeks.

CONCLUSION

The authors’ study suggests that perinatal outcomes of females with T1DM are affected by the modality of glucose monitoring and insulin regimen. CGM together with MDI injections are associated with lower rates of operative delivery, LGA infants, and fetal hypoxia.

References
Evers IM et al. Risk of complications of pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes: nationwide prospective study in the Netherlands. BMJ. 2004;328(7445):915. Persson M et al. Disproportionate body composition and perinatal outcome in large-for-gestational-age infants to mothers with type 1 diabetes. BJOG. 2012;119(5):565-72. Clausen TD et al. High prevalence of type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes in adult offspring of women with gestational diabetes mellitus or type 1 diabetes: the role of intrauterine hyperglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(2):340-6. Farrar D et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin for pregnant women with diabetes. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2016;(6):CD005542. Feig DS et al. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (CONCEPTT): a multicentre international randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10110):2347-59. Jotic A et al. Evaluation of glycaemic control, glucose variability and hypoglycaemia on long-term continuous subcutaneous infusion vs. multiple daily injections: observational study in pregnancies with pre-existing type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2020;11(4):845-58. Vestgaard M et al. Prediction of preeclampsia in type 1 diabetes in early pregnancy by clinical predictors: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(14):1933-9. Kristensen K et al. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: an observational cohort study of 186 pregnancies. Diabetologia. 2019;62(7):1143-53. Feig DS, Murphy HR. Continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: benefits for mothers, using pumps or pens, and their babies. Diabet Med. 2018;35(4):430-5. Feig DS et al. Pumps or multiple daily injections in pregnancy involving type 1 diabetes: a prespecified analysis of the CONCEPTT randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(12):2471-9.