Specimen Quality of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME) - European Medical Journal
×

Browse

Specimen Quality of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TaTME)

ICDS 2020
Authors:
Soterios George Panousopoulos, Georgios Panousis, Doukakis Paradellis, Constantinos Mavrantonis
Disclosure:

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.

INTRODUCTION

The adoption of total mesorectal excision of the rectum (TME) revolutionised surgical treatment of rectal cancer, leading to significant improvement in oncologic outcomes in recent decades. Laparoscopic TME has since proved to be non-inferior to the open technique, while conferring lower morbidity and reducing hospital stay. However, for tumours of the distal third of the rectum, TME still presents significant difficulty due to the anatomy of the pelvis. The advent of transanal surgery has encompassed the innovation of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) in an effort to facilitate complete excision while preserving the desired oncologic results.

AIM

In this study, the authors present an experience with 41 cases of patients with rectal cancer who were subjected to TaTME in the 6th Surgical Department of Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece.

METHODS

Between March 2018 and September 2019, 41 patients were subjected to TaTME for rectal cancer (Figure 1). The procedures were performed by a single surgeon and surgical team. The technique consists of transanal dissection of the rectum and mesorectum up to the level of the peritoneal recess. Following this, a laparoscopic left hemicolectomy and diverting ileostomy are performed. Finally, a coloanal handsewn anastomosis is fashioned.

Figure 1: Operative field setup for transanal total mesorectal excision.

Pathology reports were collected and compared to pathology reports of rectal cancer patients with distal rectal cancer subjected to laparoscopic sphincter-saving transanal specimen extraction operation (TaSE) by the same surgeon and surgical team. Completeness of TME, circumferential resection margin (CRM), and distal resection margin (DRM) were considered.

RESULTS

The TaTME group (n=41) had a complete or nearly complete TME specimen in 92.7% of cases versus 89.6% for the TaSE group (n=48) (Table 1). The CRM was free >1 mm in 87.8% of TaTME cases versus 85.4% of TaSE cases. The DRM was free >2 cm in all cases in both groups (Table 2).

Table 1: Specimen quality.

TaSE: transanal specimen extraction operation; TaTME: transanal total mesorectal excision; TME: total mesorectal excision.

Table 2: Circumferential resection margin.

TaSE: transanal specimen extraction operation; TaTME: transanal total mesorectal excision.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that TaTME achieves excellent CRM, DRM, and TME specimen quality in patients with distal rectal cancer, and should be considered as an alternative when treating patients in whom TME is expected to be technically challenging trans-abdominally.