Perfect or Failed ERCP: What Makes the Difference? - EMJ

Perfect or Failed ERCP: What Makes the Difference?

Download PDF
*Julius Spicak, Tomas Hucl

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

EMJ Gastroenterol. ;4[1]:108-113. DOI/10.33590/emjgastroenterol/10311684.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), failure, cannulation, precut, efficiency, complications.

Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.


Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has become an effective and safe therapeutic method, providing clinical success in more than 80% of cases. As ERCP has evolved from a diagnostic to a therapeutic procedure, technical demands have risen. Furthermore, it is an invasive procedure that can be potentially harmful when administered improperly. Quality of ERCP and procedural outcome are dependent on various factors that are related to the patient, procedure, and endoscopist. These factors are reviewed in detail and their contribution to ERCP quality is presented and discussed. Preventive therapies through procedural techniques and medical management to avoid complications are available. Proper and organised training and ERCP outcome reporting are essential for further quality improvement.

Please view the full content in the pdf above.

Join our mailing list

To receive the EMJ updates straight to your inbox free of charge, please click the button below.
Join Now