Combined Oral Administration of Analgesia and Anxiolysis for Pain Associated with Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy - European Medical Journal
×

Browse

Combined Oral Administration of Analgesia and Anxiolysis for Pain Associated with Bone Marrow Aspiration and Biopsy

|
2 Mins
Authors:
*Claudio Cerchione
Disclosure:

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

Citation
EMJ Hematol. ;6[1]:58-60. Abstract Review No. AR9.

Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.

Receive our free quarterly newsletters and your choice of journal publication alerts, straight to your inbox.

Join our mailing list

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy (BMAB) is a painful procedure. The commonly adopted local infiltration anaesthesia (LIA) with lidocaine is unable to relieve the pain during the most uncomfortable phases, or the anticipatory anxiety related to pain recalled thereafter. As there are no formal guidelines for adding a sedoanalgesic premedication before beginning BMAB, many combinations have been adopted by several authors.1-8

AIMS

Our randomised and patient-blinded trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of opioid and benzodiazepine agent combination plus LIA in patients who underwent BMAB for haematological malignancies, which was the primary endpoint of the trial. The secondary endpoints were firstly, to define if patients who had undergone BMAB without LIA preferred sedoanalgesia and secondly, to demonstrate if sedoanalgesia could influence the quality of the biological specimen harvested.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned into two arms, receiving either placebo plus LIA (standard group: 48.6%) or oral fentanyl citrate 200 µg plus oral midazolam 5 mg in addition to LIA (combo group: 51.4%) during BMAB. Preprocedural anxiety and procedural pain were assessed according to the Numeric Rating Scale (0–10), dividing the time of the procedure into five intervals (T0, T1, T2a, T2b, and T3) and evaluating discomfort grade during each moment of the procedure in both groups. Cognitive function was measured before and 30 minutes after the procedure. Possible side effects were recorded, as well as the adequacy of tissue samples harvested. A telephone interview was performed 24 hours later. A total number of 116 patients were enrolled in the study. Nine patients did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded. Fifty-two patients were randomised and assigned to the standard group and 55 to the combo group (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Flow chart of the trial.
BMAB: Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy; NRS: Numeric Rating Scale; LIA: local infiltration anaesthesia.

RESULTS

At T2b and T3 (corresponding to the biopsy time and time after the biopsy, respectively) there was a significantly lower (p<0.05) perception of pain in the patients who received sedoanalgesia (combo group) compared to those who did not (standard group). Moreover, 100% of the patients in the combo group who had previously undergone this procedure without premedication reported that they would prefer sedoanalgesia for the subsequent procedures, thus confirming the effectiveness of this combination in relieving anticipatory anxiety. Finally, the histological specimen was found to be high in quality, as defined by International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) standards.9

CONCLUSION

Administration of oral analgesia and anxiolysis is a safe and feasible option to be used in the outpatient setting; sedoanalgesia is very effective in reducing pain during the biopsy and it diminishes the anticipatory anxiety related to a painful procedure. Patients should have the option to choose between local anaesthesia alone or sedoanalgesia plus local anaesthesia.

References
Cerchione C et al. Combined oral administration of analgesia and anxiolysis for pain associated with bone marrow aspiration and biopsy. EHA Congress, 14-17 June, 2018. Talamo G et al. Oral administration of analgesia and anxiolysis for pain associated with bone marrow biopsy. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(3):301-5. Mystakidou K et al. Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate: Overview of pharmacological and clinical characteristics. Drug Deliv. 2006;13(4):269-76. Farrar JT et al. Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate: randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial for treatment of breakthrough pain in cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998;90(8):611-6. Coluzzi PH et al. Breakthrough cancer pain: A randomized trial comparing oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) and morphine sulfate immediate release (MSIR). Pain. 2001;91(1-2):123-30. Talamo G et al. Perceived levels of pain associated with bone marrow aspirates and biopsies. J Support Oncol. 2012;10(4):166-70 Hjortholm N et al. Strategies of pain reduction during the bone marrow biopsy. Ann Hematol. 2013;92(2):145-9. Park SH et al. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of low-dose intravenous Lorazepam to reduce procedural pain during bone marrow aspiration and biopsy. Pain Med. 2008;9(2):249-52. Lee SJ et al; International Council for Standardization in Hematology. ICSH guidelines for the standardization of bone marrow specimens and reports. Int J Lab Hematol. 2008;30(5):349-64.