The Future of Mobile Health Applications and Devices in Cardiovascular Health - European Medical Journal
×

Browse

The Future of Mobile Health Applications and Devices in Cardiovascular Health

| Innovations Download as | PDF
Authors:
Heval Mohamed Kelli,1 Bradley Witbrodt,1 *Amit Shah1,2
Disclosure:

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements:

Dr Kelli is supported by the Katz foundation. Dr Witbrodt is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under T32 HL007745. Dr Shah is sponsored by the American Heart Association (AHA) (SDG-20593449) and NIH (UL1-TR-000454, KL2-TR-00045, K23-HL-127251). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders.

Received:
01.03.16
Accepted:
22.09.16
Citation
EMJ Innov. ;1[1]:92-97.

Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) is the utilisation of mobile technologies in healthcare and has particular relevance in improving lifestyle behaviours which may ultimately reduce cardiovascular disease risk. Various intervention studies for example integrate self-monitoring of diet and physical activity with text messaging systems to improve intermediate outcomes. Currently the future progress of mHealth technologies in formal diagnostic and therapeutic roles is pending and includes the need to validate and standardise accelerometer and heart rate data from various devices. Data also needs to be integrated from such devices into the medical record system to facilitate communication between providers and patients. Although short-term behaviour changes have been found with technologies such as Fitbit® (Fitbit, Inc., San Francisco, California, USA), whether such technologies/interventions lead to sustained behaviour change and reduced risk of myocardial infarction and death remains to be seen.

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death and disability among men and women in the world and the number of deaths per year caused by the disease is expected to rise to 22.2 million by 2030.1 Identification of modifiable risk factors is essential in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Mobile health (mHealth), the use of mobile computing technologies in healthcare mostly through smartphone applications (apps) and wearable devices, is a rapidly growing field with many apps focussed on cardiovascular disease prevention through behaviour modification.1,2 Most apps focus on three major topics including: dietary management, physical activity promotion, and smoking cessation. The purpose of this review is to examine the current state of mHealth smartphone apps and wearables in the context of improving the cardiovascular behaviours suggested by the American Heart Association’s (AHA), ‘Life’s Simple 7’, which are: blood pressure control, cholesterol management, blood sugar management, smoking cessation, weight control, physical activity promotion, and healthy eating.3 All of the Simple 7 are amenable to modification through mHealth interventions by varying degrees; diet, activity, and smoking cessation have an impact on weight, cholesterol, blood sugar management, and blood pressure.2,4-6

We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the World Wide Web from inception to January 2016. We selected studies and articles relevant to the topic of mHealth in relation to physical activity, dietary management, and smoking cessation. New trends in mHealth were also evaluated. Studies that did not include smartphones or wristband devices were excluded. This review was restricted to certain validated studies and randomised controlled trials focussed on using new mHealth technologies with a sustainable impact. We focussed on a selection of manuscripts that were considered the highest impact based on the three authors’ reviews. The authors undertook an iterative process to screen articles and select papers with the highest impact. Table 1 presents a summary of the selected articles discussed.

Table 1: Selected studies on the impact of mobile health on physical activity, dietary management, and smoking cessation.

CHANGES IN PREVALENCE OF MOBILE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY USE OVER TIME

Smartphone access and utilisation of health apps are quickly rising. According to the Pew Research Center based in Washington DC, USA, approximately 64% of adults possess a smartphone in the USA and 68% of these access the internet through their devices. An estimated 62% of smartphone owners utilise their phone to access health information and obtain education about diseases and health conditions, while 57% utilise their phone to perform online banking.7 Approximately 100,000 mHealth apps on iTunes® (Apple Inc., Cupertino, California, USA) and Google PlayTM (Google Inc., Mountain View, California, USA) are available, as well as ≥400 wearable activity monitors.8 These figures are expected to further increase as technologies advance.9,10

MOBILE HEALTH INTERVENTIONS TO INCREASE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

According to a recent study, only half of American adults met the physical activity guidelines promoted by the AHA.1 Physical activity has many benefits in reducing low density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure, and fasting glucose while maintaining weight loss and psychological wellbeing.11 mHealth apps can engage participants to encourage physical activity through reminders and goal-setting. In a recent meta-analysis, pedometers were found to increase physical activity by 27% compared with baseline; pedometer users also experienced slight decreases in BMI (0.4 kg/m2) and 4 mmHg decreases in systolic blood pressure. These decreases are similar to those seen in studies evaluating blood pressure-lowering drugs.12 Clinical trials use interventions of varying sophistication, ranging from a smartphone app to wristband or waistband accelerometers and sophisticated health coaching programmes. An example of a low-resource study was the SMART MOVE trial; a randomised, open label trial of 78 Android™ smartphone users who were assigned to either lifestyle improvement education versus education and smartphone app (Accupedo-Pro Pedometer) which gave automated feedback on daily step counts and facilitated goal-setting. After 8 weeks, those who were assigned to the intervention group (the smartphone app group), walked approximately 1,000 more steps per day than the group who did not receive the app.13 Although the cost was low because it did not involve investment in a separate pedometer, it was limited to smartphone users with the Android operating system. On the other hand, the mActive study was more sophisticated because it provided 42 participants with wristband pedometers (which did not provide step counts) and randomised them to automated smart-texts (versus none) that delivered physician-written, theory-based texts 3-times per day based on 16 personal factors and real-time data to encourage daily physical activity.10 The results were more impressive, with an increase of 3,300 step counts documented in the intervention group versus blinded controls. Overall, it appears that more aggressive, personalised interventions may have a larger effect size on promoting physical activity, although this remains to be proven in a large, adequately powered study.

The introduction of wearable devices such as Fitbit and Apple Watch® provide further opportunities in physical activity tracking and promotion. However, there are limited studies that show the sustainable impact on improving physical activity over time. A study of 67 adults suggested improved physical activity at 6-week follow-up after utilisation of Fitbit device for instant feedback on performance.14 Another trial of postmenopausal overweight women also showed similar findings; those in the intervention group with a Fitbit demonstrated increased physical activity and adherence to their steps goal after a limited period of time.15

DIETARY MANAGEMENT USING MOBILE HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES

Although physical activity can facilitate weight loss, such programmes by themselves have not proven particularly successful at leading to weight loss. A cornerstone of weight management is restriction of caloric consumption; mHealth apps may for example help with this endeavour by providing electronic diaries that facilitate calorie counting with integrated food databases.16,17 Many studies have focussed on the impact of dietary self-monitoring and have found a significant association with weight loss.18

A cross-sectional online survey reported 33% of sport dietitians used diet apps to assess and track dietary intake, and smartphone apps were rated better than traditional assessment methods by 47% of participants.19 The SMART trial presented promising results of weight loss at 24 months by utilising a personal digital assistant with a feedback system focussed on self-monitoring and recording food intake.20 Another randomised study among overweight subjects reported decreased energy consumption in subjects using a dietary monitoring app.21 Weight loss was documented at 8 weeks after monitoring dietary intake through the mobile app ‘Lose It’ (FitNow, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA) in another small study.22

Current apps may benefit from additional scientific rigour: one study concluded that most apps only included 19% of the 20 behavioural strategies in evidence-based interventions.23 It is unclear if isolated dietary apps or interventions have a sustainable impact on weight loss. Although validation studies are needed, the combination of dietary and physical activity self-monitoring with individualised behavioural modification plans may hold the most promise in not only helping to lose weight, but also sustaining the weight loss.

SMOKING CESSATION

Smoking cessation is another risk reduction behaviour that mHealth strategies have been used to promote.24,25 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable and premature death worldwide. Smoking cessation is associated with reduction in cardiovascular mortality by approximately one-third.11 Smartphone apps have a lower barrier to entry, available at minimal cost to those who already use smartphones, and are preferable for many individuals compared to a smoking cessation hotline.26 Many mHealth studies focus on SMS text-based smoking cessation services with tailored reminders and messages as well as telephone counselling.27 The txt2stop smoking cessation study randomised 5,800 subjects either to a mobile phone smoking cessation programme with motivational messages and behaviour change support or to a control group that received text messages unrelated to quitting. The intervention more than doubled the chance of biochemically-verified continuous abstinence at 6 months in experimental groups compared with control (10.7% versus 4.9%).25 The long-term impact of the intervention however was not studied. Despite the promise of such apps to help the success of smoking cessation with little cost, they rarely adhere to established evidence-based tactics, and therefore may be underachieving.28 A combination of various lifestyle interventions may work together in synergy. Several studies have shown a significant increase in smoking cessation success by adding exercise as an additional intervention. These combination programmes have demonstrated success at ≥1 year.29,30 Other arenas of mHealth integration and synergy include incorporation of social media and wearable devices into tobacco control programmes.31

NEW TRENDS IN MOBILE HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES

The growing field of mHealth creates a platform for innovation and new trends in capturing patient health data, providing new ways to promote healthy lifestyle. Several major technology companies including Apple Inc., Google Inc., and Samsung Group (SAMSUNG, Suwon, South Korea) have integrated new approaches for health activity tracking in the design of their smartphones.32,33 Apple’s HealthKitTM platform is a central portal that organises physical activity data from the phone’s accelerometer as well as other health information from associated apps, such as various blood pressure monitors and scales. Large scale electronic medical record systems such as Epic and Cerner are also working with Apple to integrate with HealthKit.34 Physical activity quantification is expanding beyond steps; for example, companies like FocusMotion (Focus Ventures, Inc., Los Angeles, California, USA) are expanding the portfolio of activities to include weight lifting and yoga. Heart rate is increasingly being offered on several popular wristband devices to measure performance and caloric consumption although such data have not been validated in peer-reviewed literature. A new paradigm of ‘smart clothing’ allows for continuous data collection from the chest during work-outs and typically yields more accuracy than wrist-based devices during physical activity in detecting heart rate.

As accelerometers become more versatile and heart rate sensors become increasingly accurate and available, the apps of these data streams also increase beyond fitness into prediction algorithms. To manage such data, companies such as Validic (Motivation Science, Inc., Durham, North Carolina, USA), Human API (Human API, Redwood City, California, USA), and Open mHealth (San Francisco, California, USA) can facilitate the aggregation of cloud-based mHealth data for apps in various analytic models. To further expand the possibilities of such data to improve health outcomes, these services would need to integrate with electronic medical record systems. Patient providers may also benefit.35,36 For example, it may lead to feedback systems which objectively quantify behaviour data from mHealth devices to inform providers how to best treat their patients with a personalised wellness approach.36

THE POTENTIAL TRANSFORMATION OF MOBILE HEALTH FROM CONSUMER GRADE DEVICES TO MEDICAL GRADE INTERVENTIONS

mHealth technologies are increasingly being utilised in translational healthcare research settings, for example to provide early warning signs for seizures by monitoring the autonomic nervous system in real-time.37 This potential however, needs to be matched with infrastructure changes that allow such data to sync with the electronic medical record and healthcare system as a whole.33 This integration will require continued validation of current technologies, standardisation of data outputs, and integration of mHealth data streams into the clinical decision-making processes.38,39

Future research should be aimed at evaluating consumer wearables and smartphones for medical use, given their ubiquity and potential utilisation in the clinical setting.40 It naturally follows that not everyone will have the exact same device or smartphone, therefore future research efforts are needed to standardise the outputs obtained from multiple devices in order to achieve generalisable recommendations for digital health interventions. Ultimately such efforts will help clinician assessments of health and disease, as well as allow them to recommend specific programmes or apps for patients needing lifestyle changes to improve cardiovascular health.

In addition to healthcare integration, more clinical trials are needed to confirm findings from smaller studies at various centres and demonstrate generalisability.25,41-43 In addition to the studies already mentioned, a recent success has been the TEXT ME trial which implemented a simple one-way (no interaction) text-messaging reminder system of individualised messages to motivate certain lifestyle changes based on patient need. The study included 710 patients with coronary heart disease randomised to text messages versus usual care, followed over 6 months, and showed significant reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and blood pressure.9 While this and other similar studies hold promise, the duration of benefit and translation of outcomes remain in question. Nonetheless, costs are minimal when considering this type of fully automated, one-way intervention, and could be easily integrated into a healthcare framework.

mHealth programmes represent the next wave of biotechnologies after medical devices to benefit from industry and academic partnerships. Such partnerships can help to ensure that validation studies are conducted with appropriate design and validation of hardware against the gold standard. For example, devices such as the Fitbit Charge HR have yet to provide any validation data on the accuracy of their heart rate monitor; as such the heart rate data cannot be used in a medically meaningful way until this occurs.

There are several limitations of this article. It is a narrative review focussed on highlighting the relevant studies discussing the use of mHealth technology in behaviour change and cardiovascular risk reduction. As such, the review is not a comprehensive analysis of all such studies; certain studies that were not deemed high enough impact by the authors were excluded. mHealth technologies and devices are rapidly changing which limits reproducibility and quality control. Novel interventions with clinical impact may, to a certain extent, lose relevance over time as newer smartphones, wristbands, etc. are released and older versions are phased out.

CONCLUSION

mHealth technologies offer promise with regard to the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease via risk factor modification. Various studies have been published to demonstrate efficacy in promoting small but substantial behaviour changes and improvements in health status. Despite this, the potential is scattered amongst myriad consumer-grade devices which do not have validation, and although large-scale buy-in from payers is possible, it has not yet occurred. The next steps include improved analytics, evaluation, and advancement of newer sensors such as heart rate monitors, and larger clinical trials. Private and academic partnerships will be vital to the future of the field, and the potential public health benefit is very large given the ubiquity of such devices in the world.

References
Mozaffarian D et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics - 2016 Update: A report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):e38-360. Artinian NT et al. Interventions to promote physical activity and dietary lifestyle changes for cardiovascular risk factor reduction in adults: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122(4):406-41. Lloyd-Jones DM et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction the American Heart Association’s Strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation. 2010;121(4):586-613. Eckel RH. Preventive cardiology by lifestyle intervention: opportunity and/ or challenge? Presidential address at the 2005 American Heart Association Scientific Sessions. Circulation. 2006;113(22):2657-61. Eckel RH et al. 2013 AHA/ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2960-84. Appel LJ et al. Effects of comprehensive lifestyle modification on blood pressure control: main results of the PREMIER clinical trial. JAMA. 2003;289(16):2083-93. Pew Research Center. Smith A. US smartphone use in 2015. 2015. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/ u s-smartphone-use-in-2015/. Last accessed: 1 March 2016. Vandrico Inc. Wearable Tech market. 2015. Available at: http://vandrico.com/ wearables/. Last accessed: 2 March 2016. Chow CK et al. Effect of lifestyle-focused text messaging on risk factor modification in patients with coronary heart disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(12):1255-63. Martin SS et al. mActive: a randomized clinical trial of an automated mHealth intervention for physical activity promotion. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(11):e002239. Barth J et al. Efficacy of psychosocial interventions for smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Behav Med. 2006:32(1):10-20. Bravata DM et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298(19):2296-304. Glynn LG et al. Effectiveness of a smartphone application to promote physical activity in primary care: the SMART MOVE randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 2014;64(624):e384-91. Wang JB et al. Wearable Sensor/Device (Fitbit One) and SMS Text-Messaging Prompts to Increase Physical Activity in Overweight and Obese Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Telemed J E Health. 2015;21(10):782-92. Cadmus-Bertram LA et al. Randomized Trial of a Fitbit-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Women. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(3):414-8. Wing RR et al. A self-regulation program for maintenance of weight loss. New Engl J Med. 2006;355(15):1563-71. Franz MJ et al. Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimum 1-year follow-up. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107(10):1755-67. Burke LE et al. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(1):92-102. Jospe MR et al. Diet app use by sports dietitians: a survey in five countries. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth. 2015;3(1):e7. Burke LE et al. Using mHealth technology to enhance self-monitoring for weight loss: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(1):20-6. Turner-McGrievy GM et al. Comparison of traditional versus mobile app self-monitoring of physical activity and dietary intake among overweight adults participating in an mHealth weight loss program. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(3):513-8. Wharton CM et al. Dietary self-monitoring, but not dietary quality, improves with use of smartphone app technology in an 8-week weight loss trial. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(5):440-4. Pagoto S et al. Evidence-based strategies in weight-loss mobile apps. Am J Prev Medicine. 2013;45(5):576-82. Brendryen H, Kraft P. Happy ending: a randomized controlled trial of a digital multi-media smoking cessation intervention. Addiction. 2008;103(3):478-84. Free C et al. Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): a single-blind, randomised trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9785):49-55. BinDhim NF et al. Who uses smoking cessation apps? A feasibility study across three countries via smartphones. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2014;2(1):e4. Ghorai K et al. mHealth for smoking cessation programs: a systematic review. J Pers Med. 2014;4(3):412-23. Abroms LC et al. iPhone apps for smoking cessation: a content analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(3):279-85. Horn K et al. Effects of physical activity on teen smoking cessation. Pediatrics. 2011;128(4):e801-11. Ussher MH et al. Exercise interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;1:CD002295. Jacobs MA et al. Facebook apps for smoking cessation: a review of content and adherence to evidence-based guidelines. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(9):e205. Rosenberger ME et al. Twenty-four hours of sleep, sedentary behavior, and physical activity with nine wearable devices. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;4(3):457-65. Marceglia S et al. A standards-based architecture proposal for integrating patient mHealth apps to electronic health record systems. Appl Clin Inform. 2015;6(3):488-505. Forbes. Versel N. Apple’s HealthKit connects with Mayo and Epic, but don’t call it revolutionary. 2014. Available at http://www.forbes.com/sites/ neilversel/2014/06/03/apples-health-kitconnects-with-mayo-and-epic-but-dont-call-it-revolutionary/#559419e158a3. Last accessed: 1 March 2016. Pennic F. Cerner launches Apple Watch app, push HealthKit data to Cerner Millennium. 2015. Prnewswire. Cerner to integrate patient-generated data using validic digital health platform. 2015. Available at: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cerner-to-integrate-patient-generated-data-using-validic-digital-health-platform-300049223.html. Last accessed: 1 March 2016. Sarkis RA et al. Autonomic changes following generalized tonic clonic seizures: An analysis of adult and pediatric patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2015;115:113-8. Comstock J. Eight things we learned about HealthKit from Duke, Ochsner. 2014. Available at: http://mobihealthnews. com/38891/eight-things-we-learned-about-healthkit-from-duke-oschner. Last accessed: 1 May 2016. Beredimas N et al. A reusable ontology for primitive and complex HL7 FHIR data types. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2015;2015:2547-50. Evenson KR et al. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12(1):1-22. Chow CK et al. Effect of Lifestyle-Focused Text Messaging on Risk Factor Modification in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;314(12):1255-63. Sirriyeh R et al. Physical activity and adolescents: an exploratory randomized controlled trial investigating the influence of affective and instrumental text messages. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15(4):825-40. Prestwich A et al. Can implementation intentions and text messages promote brisk walking? A randomized trial. Health Psychol. 2010;29(1):40-9.