Personalized Locomotor Training with Non-Invasive Spinal Cord Stimulation for Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury - European Medical Journal

Personalized Locomotor Training with Non-Invasive Spinal Cord Stimulation for Functional Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury

1 Mins
Neurology
Authors:
Umema Rafay , 1 Muhammet B. Kocer , 1 Attiyeh Vasaghi , 1 Katrina Armstrong , 1 Sydney Sass , 2 Kristine C. Cowley , 1,3 * Katinka Stecina 1,3
  • 1. University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
  • 2. University of Winnipeg, Canada
  • 3. Spinal Cord Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
*Correspondence to [email protected]
Disclosure:

Cowley has served on a scientific review advisory board for research grants with Craig Neilsen Research Foundation. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements:

The authors would like to thank all study participants and Peisan Lew and Matt Ellis for technical support.

Citation:
Neurol AMJ. ;2[1]:34-35. https://doi.org/10.33590/neurolamj/QHXD8365.
Keywords:
Electromyography (EMG), functional electrical stimulation, locomotor training, metabolic outcomes, neurorehabilitation, spinal cord injury (SCI), trans-spinal electrical stimulation (ts-ES).

Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a central nervous system injury that often leads to motor, sensory, and autonomic dysfunction. Non-invasive trans-spinal electrical stimulation (ts-ES) has been shown to activate neural networks below the injury and improve motor,1,2 as well as autonomic function recovery after SCI.3 The objective of this study4 was to compare changes in motor and autonomic function attributable to ts-ES in individuals with incomplete SCI after 4 weeks of personalized locomotor (treadmill-walking-based) training.

METHODS

Participants (n=6, 1 female) received 4 weeks of treadmill training with personalized step-cycle based peripheral functional electrical stimulation (FES) with or without additional, non-invasive lumbar ts-ES. Spinal stimulation was done by rectangular, monophasic current pulses (1 ms) at 40 Hz frequency for max 1–3-minute bouts, with intensity adjusted for each participant (17–35 mA). Clinical outcome measures of motor function (2-minute walk test, Berg Balance, and modified SCIM-Mobility) and metabolic analysis were assessed before and after training. Metabolic analysis of oxygen consumption was performed at the start and at the end of the training, which consisted of automatic, breath-by-breath analysis of oxygen consumption (VO2 sub-max), and heart rate measurements during graded treadmill tasks (from seated rest, standing, to walking at increasing speeds). Ground forces and electromyography (EMG) recordings while walking on a treadmill allowed quantification of muscle activity, and a combination of locomotor assessment tools were used to create cycle-based analysis of each person’s locomotor EMG profile from randomly selected steps (n=18–28). Averaged EMGs obtained with and without ts-ES were compared by using a 500 ms window aligned to maximum vertical force loading on the left leg. Changes induced by ts-ES in each muscle’s root-mean square (RMS) in the raw EMG, and mean amplitude of the filtered and rectified EMG were measured in this window and calculated as percent of the EMG activity during no ts-ES condition.

RESULTS

Quantitative analysis of EMG activity showed facilitation of muscle activity in ankle and knee extensors with about 10–25% increases during forward walking. Qualitatively, based on participant feedback, ts-ES in addition to FES during locomotor training was tolerable, and improved leg movement EMG output, even during backward walking and step-arm-reach tasks. Moreover, ts-ES tended to increase heart rate and VO2 sub-max when applied acutely, i.e., within one session for 1–2 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

Personalized rehabilitation strategies combining ts-ES with locomotor training with not only forward walking, but also backward walking or step-and-reach tasks, in addition to FES, have a realistic potential to improve metabolic output during recovery in people living with SCI.

References
Flett S et al. Spinal electrical stimulation to improve sympathetic autonomic functions needed for movement and exercise after spinal cord injury: a scoping clinical review. J Neurophysiol. 2022;128(3):649-70. Nardone R et al. Noninvasive spinal cord stimulation: technical aspects and therapeutic applications. Neuromodulation. 2015;18(7):580-91. Zaaya M et al. Transspinal stimulation and step training alter function of spinal networks in complete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2021;7(1):55. Rafay U et al. Personalized locomotor training with non-invasive spinal cord stimulation for functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Poster 6. AAN Annual Meeting, April 5-9, 2025.

Rate this content's potential impact on patient outcomes

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this content.