Editor’s Pick: Selection of Appropriate Tools for Evaluating Obesity in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients - European Medical Journal
×

Browse

Editor’s Pick: Selection of Appropriate Tools for Evaluating Obesity in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients

| Download as | PDF
10 Mins
Authors:
*Yang Xu
Disclosure:

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

Received:
02.05.17
Accepted:
06.07.17
Citation
EMJ Repro Health. ;3[1]:48-52.

Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.

Abstract

Patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have unique endocrine and metabolic characteristics, whereby the incidence and potentiality of obesity, as well as the accompanying risk of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, are significantly increased. Currently, BMI is widely used to diagnose and classify obesity. However, body fat is not accounted for in BMI calculations, and the missed diagnosis rate of obesity is nearly 50%. Since PCOS patients with normal weight are also characterised by a high content of fat or fat distribution of android type, some of these patients are often overlooked if an inappropriate diagnostic tool for obesity is selected, which affects the therapeutic effect. Herein, we have reviewed the mechanism and diagnostic methods of PCOS-related obesity and suggested that not only body weight and circumference alone, but also the body fat percentage and fat distribution, should be considered for the evaluation of obesity in PCOS patients.

INTRODUCTION

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disease in women of childbearing age. It is characterised by chronic anovulation and hyperandrogenism, and commonly manifests as irregular menstruation, infertility, hirsutism, and obesity. The pathophysiological changes of PCOS involve abnormalities in the neuroendocrine system, glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, protein metabolism, and local ovarian regulatory factors. It affects a woman’s reproductive function and causes long-term complications, such as Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and endometrial cancer, which pose a serious threat to a woman’s health.

Due to the heterogeneity of clinical manifestations of PCOS, its definition and diagnosis remain controversial. The clinical practice guidelines issued by the Endocrine Expert Working Group in the USA and Europe in 20131 recommended the use of criteria published in 2003 by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ESHRE/ASRM):2 a patient can be diagnosed with PCOS if two of the following three criteria are met: oligoovulation or anovulation; clinical and/or biochemical signs of hyperandrogenism; polycystic ovaries and exclusion of other aetiologies, such as congenital adrenal hyperplasia, androgen-secreting tumours, and Cushing’s syndrome.

Obesity is a common clinical manifestation of PCOS, with an incidence of 50–80%,3 which differs with respect to race and geographical factors. Obesity refers to an increase in body weight due to an increase in the volume of body fat and/or an increase in the number of adipocytes, or an abnormal increase in the percentage of body fat (PBF). Additionally, in obesity, body fat is excessively accumulated in certain locations.4 In the diagnosis and treatment guidelines for PCOS, weight loss and lifestyle changes are considered as the first-line treatment option for overweight or obese patients, but it is believed that PCOS patients with normal weight cannot benefit from weight loss.1

Obesity further increases the secretion of androgens, affecting the metabolic and reproductive functions. In PCOS, the levels of low-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, and cholesterol are increased, while the level of high-density lipoprotein is decreased, with an increased risk of arteriosclerosis and changes in vascular endothelial function.5 In addition, PCOS also increases the risk of CVD as well as the related complications.6 Obese PCOS patients have a higher incidence of menstrual disorders and long-term anovulation than patients with normal weight and, thus, show a poorer effect after receiving ovulation stimulation.

MECHANISM OF POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME OBESITY

The pathogenesis of obesity is influenced by genetic and environmental factors, such as diet and lifestyle. Adipose tissue is not only an ‘energy warehouse’, but also an important endocrine organ. It can secrete numerous cytokines and hormones, and plays an important role in regulating body metabolism, inflammation, and immune response. Normal content and distribution of fat are essential for maintaining body functions and fertility potential in females. Gynoid fat distribution begins in adolescence, where an adequate fat content is conducive to triggering and maintaining a regular and ovulatory menstrual cycle. A significant decrease in adipose tissue in adulthood will lead to secondary amenorrhoea. Peripheral adipose tissue is an important site for the synthesis of oestrogen outside the ovary, where the androgen transforms into oestrogen through the aromatisation effect.7

There could be several mechanisms of obesity in PCOS. PCOS patients have a significant increase in intake of food rich in carbohydrates, high in glycaemic index, and high in saturated fat. They also have an excessively high intake of total energy and sedentary lifestyles,8 which is particularly common in individuals with genetic and environmental susceptibility.9 As compared to age and body weight matched controls, the basal metabolic rate10 and postprandial calorigenesis11 were found to be lower in PCOS patients. Due to the abnormal endocrine levels, PCOS patients have a retarded perception of satiety, which manifests as gluttony and food craving.12 Mouse models have revealed that excessive androgen increases appetite and the frequency of eating,11 as well as promoting the accumulation of abdominal fat.13 At the onset of adolescence, obesity is associated with excessive androgen.14 Thus, it is possible to control the progression of PCOS and even prevent it in adulthood by controlling the excessive androgen prior to adolescence. Veilleux et al.15 showed us that adipocyte hyperplasia (the proliferation and differentiation of preadipocytes) is predominant in the subcutaneous adipose tissue, whereas adipocyte hypertrophy (the enlargement of existing adipocytes) is present both in subcutaneous and omental adipose tissue depots. The key point is that the hypertrophic adipocytes are associated with dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance.15 Thus, obesity in PCOS not only exacerbates the existing characteristics but also affects the therapeutic results.16

COMMON DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR OBESITY

BMI: In 1842, the Belgian mathematician Quetelet17 found that body weight was proportional to the square of height. Currently, BMI is often used for the diagnosis and classification of obesity, as well as for the prediction and assessment of disease risk in epidemiological studies due to its ease of use, safety, and low cost. However, BMI does not consider the body fat, which is very important, and is unable to distinguish fat, lean body weight, or bone. If BMI alone is used to diagnose obesity, individuals with an increase in muscle mass will be mistakenly included as obese, while individuals with a high content of fat and low lean body weight will be considered to have normal BMI. In addition, with the same BMI, PBF may be different due to differences in sex, age, and race.18

Waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio: The waist-to-hip ratio can be used to indirectly measure the body fat distribution. The WC, alone or in combination with BMI, has a stronger correlation with an increased health risk than BMI alone.19 The WC reflects the abdominal or visceral fat, and has no correspondence with BMI. Hip circumference reflects different body compositions at the gluteofemoral area, such as muscle, bone, and fat. A recent study indicated that women with central obesity with BMI <25 kg/m2 are 2.03-times (95% confidence interval of adjusted odds ratio: 1.62–2.54) more likely to have at least one CVD factor when compared with normal weight women without central obesity.20

Body composition analysis: It measures the body fat, fat-free body weight, overall body water, and basal metabolic rate, and calculates PBF. The main methods for measuring body fat include bioelectrical impedance, hydrostatics plethysmography, isotope dilution technique, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and skin-fold thickness measurement.21 A high PBF is associated with insulin resistance even in patients with normal body weight.22 Thus, PBF is a good predictor of obesity,23 and is increasingly used for its value in the diagnosis of obesity.24

Based on the different racial characteristics, the World Health Organization (WHO)25 and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF)26 have determined the cut-off values of BMI and WC for the diagnosis of obesity. For adult women in China, a BMI of 24 to <28 kg/m2 is defined as overweight, and BMI ≥28 kg/m2 is defined as obese;4 a WC of ≥80 cm is defined as central obesity. Studies collected data from 13,601 adults to detect the accuracy of BMI in the diagnosis of obesity and found that if patients with a BMI >30 kg/m2 were diagnosed as obese, bioelectrical impedance was used to calculate the body fat. BMI calculations showed a specificity of up to 97% but had a sensitivity of only 42% in detecting obesity, whereby 50% of the obese population diagnosed by PBF were missed by BMI.27,28 Therefore, in the diagnosis and classification of obesity, it is necessary to refer to the content and distribution of body fat, rather than body weight and BMI alone. Nevertheless, there is a lack of consensus on the cut-off value of PBF for the diagnosis of obesity. Currently, it is recommended that the cut-off value of PBF for the diagnosis of obesity in women is 30–35%.29 In addition, our previous study found that, at a cut-off point of 29%, PBF has a sensitivity of 88.2% and a specificity of 57.7% in diagnosis of PCOS, suggesting that PBF can be used to screen PCOS due to its increased sensitivity.30

Combining BMI, PBF, and various metabolic indicators, obesity can be divided into four phenotypes:9 a) normal weight obese (NWO), b) metabolically obese normal weight (MONW), c) metabolically healthy obese, and d) metabolically unhealthy obese. Among them, body measurement data of NWO are described as BMI: 22.6±1.9, WC: 72.3±4.9, and PBF: 34.9±5.0, while those of MONW are described as: BMI: 22.5±2.0, WC: 77.5±0.3, and PBF: 31.8±5.9. A common feature of the two obese groups is that both BMI and WC are in the normal range. Kang et al.31 found that the blood pressure and fasting blood glucose level are significantly increased in NWO individuals, along with dyslipidaemia. When compared to individuals with less body fat, the mortality due to CVD is increased by 2.2-times in NWO individuals.32 MONW individuals also have a high risk of diabetes.33 These two groups of high-risk patients are often excluded from the obese category if their diagnosis is solely based on body weight, BMI, or WC.

NORMAL WEIGHT OBESITY

Ruderman et al.34 found that normal weight individuals may suffer from Type 2 diabetes mellitus, premature coronary heart disease, hypertension, and hyperlipidaemia if they have insulin resistance. Occurrence of metabolic abnormalities may be associated with the fat distribution. For normal weight patients with metabolic abnormalities, their metabolic indicators can be improved after controlling their diet and energy as well as exercising.35 In 2006, De Lorenzo et al.36 proposed the concept of NWO in individuals with a normal BMI (<25 kg/m2) but a high content of fat (PBF >30%). This type of obesity shows an incidence of 2–28% in women,37 but there is a lack of data in PCOS patients. The NWO is highly correlated to subclinical vascular inflammation and cardiovascular metabolic disease,38 and is also associated with mortality of coronary heart disease.39

There are significant differences in body composition and fat distribution between lean PCOS patients and lean controls. With matching body weights, the body fat is significantly increased and the lean body weight is significantly lower in lean PCOS patients as compared to the controls. The healthy controls show gynoid fat distribution, while majority of the lean PCOS patients (70%) show non-gynoid fat distribution, and 50% of them exhibit android fat distribution.7 This distribution of fat is characterised by an increase in visceral fat and the degree of insulin resistance.40 Lean PCOS women show the same metabolic characteristics as obese PCOS women.3,41 As compared to patients with gynoid fat distribution in which the fat is peripherally distributed, the risk of cardiovascular metabolic disease is significantly increased in patients with abdominal fat or androgenic obesity.42

CONCLUSION

In summary, PCOS patients with normal body weight or BMI may have adverse reproductive and health outcomes due to increased fat content or abnormal fat distribution. Presumably, if the lean PCOS patients are further classified by the diagnostic criteria of PBF, a considerable number of patients will be classified as NWO or MONW and may have been easily overlooked if inappropriate diagnostic tools are selected, which could affect their therapeutic options; for example, they would still benefit from controlling their body fat. Therefore, we propose that in addition to body weight and circumference, the total body fat and fat distribution should also be considered in evaluating obesity in PCOS patients.

In view of the issues mentioned, much work is still needed in the future. The methods and criteria for evaluating PCOS obesity need to be re-defined and incidences of NWO and MONW in PCOS patients need to be summarised using epidemiological statistics to facilitate early intervention and delay the progression and improve the outcome of PCOS and save medical resources.

References
Legro RS et al. Diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 98(12):4565-92. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(1):19-25. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Dunaif A. Insulin resistance and the polycystic ovary syndrome revisited: an update on mechanisms and implications. Endocr Rev. 2012;33(6):981-1030. China Overweight/Obesity Medical Nutrition Treatment Expert Consensus Writing Committee. China overweight/obesity medical nutrition treatment expert consensus (2016 edition). Chinese J Diabetes. 2016;8(9):525-40. Hart R, Norman R. Polycystic ovarian syndrome–prognosis and outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20(5):751-78. Randeva HS et al. Cardiometabolic aspects of the polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocr Rev. 2012;33(5):812-41. Kirchengast S, Huber J. Body composition characteristics and body fat distribution in lean women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(6):1255-60. Moran LJ et al. The contribution of diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour to body mass index in women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(8):2276-83. De Lorenzo A et al. New obesity classification criteria as a tool for bariatric surgery indication. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(2):681-703. Georgopoulos NA et al. Basal metabolic rate is decreased in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and biochemical hyperandrogenemia and is associated with insulin resistance. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(1):250-5. Lin AW, Lujan ME. Comparison of dietary intake and physical activity between women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome: a review. Adv Nutr. 2014;5(5):486-96. Jeanes YM et al. Binge eating behaviours and food cravings in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Appetite. 2017;109:24-32. Nohara K et al. Central mechanisms of adiposity in adult female mice with androgen excess. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014;22(6):1477-84. McCartney CR et al. Obesity and sex steroid changes across puberty: evidence for marked hyperandrogenemia in pre- and early pubertal obese girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(2):430-6. Veilleux A et al. Visceral adipocyte hypertrophy is associated with dyslipidemia independent of body composition and fat distribution in women. Diabetes. 2011;60(5):1504-11. Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Consensus on women’s health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod. 2012;27(1):14-24. Quetelet LA. A treatise on man and the development of his faculties. Obes Res. 1994;2(1):72-85. Gallagher D et al. Healthy percentage body fat ranges: an approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72(3):694-701. Cerhan JR et al. A pooled analysis of waist circumference and mortality in 650,000 adults. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014;89(3):335-45. Thaikurea L, Thammasarot J. Prevalence of normal weight central obesity among Thai healthcare providers and their association with CVD risk: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37100. Cornier MA et al.; American Heart Association Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition; Physical Activity and Metabolism; Council on Arteriosclerosis; Thrombosis and Vascular Biology; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and Stroke Council. Assessing adiposity: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;124(18):1996-2019. Madeira FB et al. Normal weight obesity is associated with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance in young adults from a middle-income country. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60673. Lavie CJ et al. Body composition and survival in stable coronary heart disease: impact of lean mass index and body fat in the “obesity paradox”. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(15):1374-80. Thibault R, Pichard C. The evaluation of body composition: a useful tool for clinical practice. Ann Nutr Metab. 2012;60(1):6-16. WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363(9403):157-63. Alberti KG et al. Metabolic syndrome–a new world-wide definition. A consensus statement from the International Diabetes Federation. Diabet Med. 2006; 23(5):469-80. Habib SS. Body mass index and body fat percentage in assessment of obesity prevalence in Saudi adults. Biomed Environ Sci. 2013;26(2):94-9. Okorodudu DO et al. Diagnostic performance of body mass index to identify obesity as defined by body adiposity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes (Lond). 2010;34(5):791-9. Snitker S. Use of body fatness cutoff points. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85(11):1057. Dou P et al. Application of receiver operating characteristic curve in the assessment of the value of body mass index, waist circumference and percentage of body fat in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome in childbearing women. J Ovarian Res. 2016;9(1):51. Kang S et al. Subclinical vascular inflammation in subjects with normal weight obesity and its association with body fat: an 18 F-FDG-PET/CT study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014;13:70. Romero-Corral A et al. Normal weight obesity: a risk factor for cardiometabolic dysregulation and cardiovascular mortality. Eur Heart J. 2010; 31(6):737-46. Eckel N et al. Characterization of metabolically unhealthy normal weight individuals: Risk factors and their associations with type 2 diabetes. Metabolism. 2015;64(8):862-71. Ruderman NB et al. The “metabolically obese,” normal-weight individual. Am J Clin Nutr. 1981;34(8):1617-21. Ruderman N et al. The metabolically obese, normal-weight individual revisited. Diabetes. 1998;47(5):699-713. De Lorenzo A et al. Normal weight obese (NWO) women: an evaluation of a candidate new syndrome. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2006;16(8):513-23. Marques-Vidal P et al. Prevalence of normal weight obesity in Switzerland: effect of various definitions. Eur J Nutr. 2008;47(5):251-7. De Lorenzo A et al. Normal-weight obese syndrome: early inflammation? Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(1):40-5. Oliveros E et al. The concept of normal weight obesity. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;56(4):426-33. Karabulut A et al. Evaluation of body fat distribution in PCOS and its association with carotid atherosclerosis and insulin resistance. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2012;28(2);111-4. Marciniak A et al. Cardiovascular system diseases in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome - the role of inflammation process in this pathology and possibility of early diagnosis and prevention. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016;23(4):537-41. Thomas M et al. The impact of hyperandrogenism in female obesity and cardiometabolic diseases associated with polycystic ovary syndrome. Horm Mol Biol Clin Invest. 2013;15(3):91-103.