TARLATAMAB plus durvalumab significantly improved survival in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer following initial chemoimmunotherapy.
The Phase III DeLLphi-305 trial demonstrated substantial improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival compared with durvalumab maintenance alone, potentially establishing a new treatment approach for patients whose disease has not progressed after initial therapy.
Tarlatamab Maintenance Improves Small-Cell Lung Cancer Outcomes
Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer remains an aggressive malignancy associated with poor outcomes, with median overall survival historically reaching approximately 12–13 months.
Tarlatamab is a bispecific T-cell engager targeting delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) and CD3, designed to direct immune cells against cancer cells. Durvalumab is a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor used in chemoimmunotherapy.
The international, randomized, open-label trial enrolled 563 patients without disease progression following initial chemoimmunotherapy. Participants received either tarlatamab plus durvalumab (282 patients) or durvalumab alone (281 patients) as first-line maintenance therapy.
Combination Therapy Significantly Extends Overall Survival
At the prespecified interim analysis, median overall survival reached 21.1 months with tarlatamab plus durvalumab, compared with 12.7 months for durvalumab alone.
This represented an 8.4-month improvement in median overall survival and a 58% reduction in the hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32–0.54; P<0.001).
Median progression-free survival also improved substantially, reaching 7.4 months with combination maintenance therapy versus 1.9 months with durvalumab alone (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.28–0.42; P<0.001).
These findings demonstrate significant improvements in both survival endpoints among patients entering the maintenance treatment phase.
Safety Considerations for Tarlatamab Combination Therapy
Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 46.8% of patients receiving tarlatamab plus durvalumab, compared with 40.6% receiving durvalumab alone.
Cytokine release syndrome was observed in nearly half of patients receiving combination therapy, although most cases were Grade 1 or 2.
The findings highlight the importance of monitoring treatment-related toxicity when considering combination immunotherapy.
Overall, DeLLphi-305 provides compelling evidence supporting tarlatamab plus durvalumab as a potential first-line maintenance strategy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Longer follow-up will help establish the durability of survival benefits and further characterize treatment safety.
Reference
Pérol M et al. Tarlatamab–Durvalumab Maintenance for Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2026. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2609482.