Evolving Role of Interventional Radiology in HCC - EMJ

This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Interventional Radiology Remains Central in HCC Care

Surgeons look at coronary screen in cath lab

Key Summary:

  • Interventional radiology treated 72.6% of patients with HCC across the 25-year study.
  • After Atezo/Bev approval, IR patient utilisation fell from 75.7% to 64.6%, while volume remained stable.
  • TARE became the dominant IR procedure and accounted for 86.8% of procedures after Atezo/Bev approval.

INTERVENTIONAL radiology remained the most utilised specialty in hepatocellular carcinoma care over 25 years, although its patient share declined following approval of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line systemic therapy. The findings also showed a substantial shift in interventional radiology practice towards transarterial radioembolisation.

The retrospective, single-centre cohort included 3,473 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated between 2000–2025 at a high-volume liver transplant centre. Overall, 71.7% of patients were male and the median age was 64 years. Data were obtained from institutional procedure records and Current Procedural Terminology codes, with analyses including descriptive statistics and chi-square tests.

Interventional radiology treated 2,520 patients (72.6%) and performed 4,313 procedures. By comparison, surgery treated 1,350 patients (38.9%), medical oncology treated 746 (21.5%), and radiation oncology treated 96 (2.8%).

TARE Becomes Dominant Interventional Radiology Procedure

Transarterial radioembolisation (TARE) accounted for 72.6% of all interventional radiology procedures, compared with 18.7% for transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) and 7.9% for ablation.

A pronounced change in procedural composition was observed following approval of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. TARE increased from 67.4% to 86.8% of interventional radiology procedures, while TACE declined from 24.7% to 2.3%.

Despite this shift, annual interventional radiology procedural volume remained stable after approval: 151 versus 192 procedures (p=0.366). However, the proportion of patients receiving interventional radiology treatment decreased significantly from 75.7% to 64.6% (p<0.001).

Interventional Radiology Supports Transplant Pathways

Interventional radiology also had a substantial role before liver transplantation. Among 939 patients who underwent liver transplantation, 510 (54.3%) received interventional radiology treatment before transplant, at a median of 201 days before transplantation. TARE accounted for 67.0% of these pre-transplant interventions.

Across the 25-year study period, the data showed that interventional radiology remained the most frequently utilised specialty in multidisciplinary hepatocellular carcinoma care. Although its proportional utilisation declined following atezolizumab plus bevacizumab approval, procedural volume was maintained, alongside a marked transition towards TARE and away from TACE.

Reference

Nadeem A et al. Interventional Radiology as the Most Utilized Treatment Specialty for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A 25-Year Multidisciplinary Analysis at a High-Volume Academic Transplant Center. J Vasc and Interventional Radiol. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2026.109089

Image credit: Adobestock/iphotothailand

 

Author:

Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.

Rate this content's potential impact on patient outcomes

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this content.