Factors Associated with Inferior Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with First-Line Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab: Results from UNITE - European Medical Journal

This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Factors Associated with Inferior Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with First-Line Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab: Results from UNITE

2 Mins
Urology
Download PDF
Authors:
* Amanda Nizam , 1 Tanya Jindal , 2 Elise Cai , 3 Cindy Y. Jiang , 4 Zachariah Thomas , 4 Eugene Oh , 5 Charles B. Nguyen , 6 Albert Jang , 7 Jeffrey Zhong , 8 Kevin Reyes , 9 Salvador Jaime-Casas , 6 Dimitra R. Bakaloudi , 10 Ali R. Khaki , 11 Ameish Govindarajan , 1 Shilpa Gupta , 1 Sumit A. Shah , 11 Matthew I. Milowsky , 12 Petros Grivas , 10 Abishek Tripathi , 6 Jason R. Brown , 13 Irene Tsung , 14 Matthew T. Campbell , 4 Omar Alhalabi , 4 Vadim S. Koshkin 3
  • 1. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Ohio, USA
  • 2. Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • 3. Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, USA
  • 4. Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
  • 5. Department of Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, USA
  • 6. Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
  • 7. Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  • 8. Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • 9. Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, USA
  • 10. Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • 11. Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University, California, USA
  • 12. Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, USA
  • 13. Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
  • 14. Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Michigan Rogel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, USA
*Correspondence to [email protected]
Acknowledgements:

The authors thank their patients for their contributions to research and all members contributing to data curation at each institution.

Keywords:
Advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC), enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV+P), prognostic factors.
Citation:
EMJ Urol. ;14[1]:35-38. https://doi.org/10.33590/emjurol/0036A70Y.

Each article is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV+P) is the preferred first-line (1L) regimen for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC).1,2 Despite the robust efficacy of EV+P demonstrated in the landmark EV-302 clinical trial, 10% of patients experienced primary progression (PD) on 1L EV+P, highlighting the need to identify those at risk for early treatment failure.2 The authors hypothesised that the presence of mixed variant-predominant or pure variant histology (VH) in conjunction with previously described poor prognostic factors in aUC, such as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≥1, presence of liver metastases, haemoglobin (Hgb) level <10 g/dL, and elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), would be associated with inferior outcomes, including early PD.3-6

MATERIALS AND METHODS

UNITE is a multi-site retrospective study across 17 sites in the USA of patients with aUC treated with targeted agents, including EV. Patients who received at least 1 dose of 1L EV+P were included. Observed response rate (ORR) was assessed in patients with post-baseline imaging. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from EV+P start to PD or death. Early PD was defined as radiographic or clinical PD occurring within ≤12 weeks from EV+P start. Baseline clinicopathologic factors, somatic alterations by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) score were assessed, and in an exploratory analysis, compared between patients with and without early PD using Fisher’s exact and Mann–Whitney U tests. In the overall population, associations between a priori selected baseline factors and outcomes were evaluated using univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) logistic and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Among 387 patients treated with 1L EV+P, 52 experienced early PD. NGS was available in 238 patients (32 with early PD) and HER2 IHC score was available in 83 patients (eight with early PD). At EV+P start, median age was 73 years (range: 40–99); 73% of patients were male; 81% of patients were White; 77% had ECOG PS 0–1; 74% had lower tract primary tumour; and 16% had liver metastases. Histology included pure UC in 65% of patients, mixed UC-predominant in 22% of patients, and VH in 12% of patients. Median follow-up was 12.2 months (95% CI: 11.2–15.0). ORR was 57.4% in 339 evaluable patients.

Early PD occurred in 13.4% of patients. Median PFS and OS were 12.2 months (95% CI: 8.8–17.0) and 22.8 months (95% CI: 18.6–56.2), respectively. VH, ECOG PS ≥2, lower Hgb, and higher NLR were associated with early PD (all p<0.05). Somatic alterations by NGS and HER2 IHC score were not associated with outcomes including early PD. On UVA, ECOG PS ≥2 and NLR ≥5 were associated with lower ORR and shorter PFS and OS, while VH, presence of visceral or liver metastases, and Hgb <10 g/dL were associated with shorter PFS and OS (all p<0.05). On MVA (Table 1), ECOG PS ≥2 and NLR ≥5 were independently associated with lower ORR; VH with shorter PFS; and ECOG PS ≥2, Hgb <10 g/dL, and NLR ≥5 with shorter PFS and OS.

Table 1: Multivariable analysis of a priori selected baseline factors and outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab.
*Statistically significant (p<0.05).
ECOG PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; Hgb: haemoglobin; HR: hazard ratio; NLR: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; OR: odds ratio; ORR: observed response rate; OS: overall survival; PFS: progression-free survival; UC: urothelial carcinoma; VH: mixed variant-predominant or pure variant histology; vs: versus.

CONCLUSION

Inferior outcomes, including early PD, on 1L EV+P occurred more frequently in patients with VH and adverse prognostic features previously identified in platinum- and immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated cohorts. The persistence of these prognostic factors across therapeutic classes suggests that poor outcomes in aUC are largely driven by treatment-agnostic, tumour-intrinsic biology. Integration of circulating tumour DNA, histologic, and molecular correlates may refine future risk stratification models.

References
Nizam A et al. Factors associated with inferior outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab: results from UNITE. Abstract A0861. EAU Congress, 13-16 March, 2026. Powles T et al. Enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab in untreated advanced urothelial cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:875-88. Bajorin DF et al. Long-term survival in metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma and prognostic factors predicting outcome of therapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:3173-81. Bellmunt J et al. Prognostic factors in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract experiencing treatment failure with platinum-containing regimens. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1850-5. Abuhelwa AY et al. Enhanced Bellmunt risk score for survival prediction in urothelial carcinoma treated with immunotherapy. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022;20:132-8. Khaki AR et al. A new prognostic model in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4:464-72.

Rate this content's potential impact on patient outcomes

Average rating / 5. Vote count:

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this content.